4.2 Article

Different Biology and Clinical Outcome According to the Absolute Numbers of Clonal B-Cells in Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis (MBL)

Journal

CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY
Volume 78B, Issue -, Pages S19-S23

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20533

Keywords

monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis; chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; B-cells

Funding

  1. Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research
  2. NCI
  3. Bernstein Family Fund for Leukemia Research
  4. AIRC-Milano
  5. Fondazione Cariplo
  6. Prin-Muir and Fondazione Anna Villa e Felice Rusconi-Varese
  7. [5K23CA113408]
  8. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K23CA113408] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biological and clinical relationship between Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL) and Monoclonal B-cell Lymphocytosis (MBL) has now been reported in some detail. This review investigates associations between biology and disease activity as they relate to the absolute numbers of abnormal cells. The clonal B-cells in CLL-type MBL are indistinguishable from CLL with respect to surface phenotype and the presence of chromosomal abnormalities. However, the majority of CLL-type MBL cases in the general population have very low numbers of clonal B-cells, typically in the range 0.1-10 per mu L, and such cases use different IGHV genes than higher-count CLL-type MBL cases and often show intraclonal heterogeneity. Cases with higher counts are biologically similar to CLL although there is a relationship between the CLL cell count at presentation and the likelihood of further clonal expansion. Individuals presenting with CLL cell counts above 2,000 per mu L are more likely to have gradually increasing B-cell counts over time and although the risk of requiring treatment for progressive CLL remains low there may be impaired normal B-cell activity. (C) 2010 International Clinical Cytometry Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available