4.5 Article

Serum hematopoietic growth factors as diagnostic and prognostic markers of acute renal allograft rejection: A potential role for serum stem cell factor

Journal

CYTOKINE
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 779-785

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2011.09.011

Keywords

Rejection; Diagnosis; Cytokine; Biomarker

Funding

  1. Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program in the Eleventh Five-year Plan Period [2008BAI60B04]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30801124, 81170692]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) are proliferative and chemotactic agents for hematopoietic stem cells, although their functions on renal transplantation are rarely reported. This study aimed to investigate the association of HGFs with acute T cell-mediated renal rejection. Experimental design: A cytokine bead array was used to analyze 10 HGFs in the sera of 32 patients with acute T cell-mediated renal allograft rejection before and during rejection and after rejection reversal. Stable renal allograft recipients (n = 38) were also investigated. Results: Serum levels of stem cell factor (SCF), IL-3, flt3 ligand, G-CSF, M-CSF and GM-CSF were elevated during episodes of rejection compared with before and after rejection. Serum concentrations of SCF, G-CSF, flt3 ligand and IL-3 were significantly higher than in the absence of rejection. Moreover, serum SCF levels were significantly higher in patients before rejection versus stable controls. Conclusions: HGFs are reported to be involved in acute T cell-mediated renal allograft rejection. A direct correlation was observed between SCF levels and the occurrence of acute renal allograft rejection which may represent an effective diagnostic and predictive biomarker for acute cellular renal allograft rejection. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available