4.4 Article

Temporal-spatial segregation among hummingbirds foraging on honeydew in a temperate forest in Mexico

Journal

CURRENT ZOOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 56-62

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/czoolo/57.1.56

Keywords

Honeydew; Hummingbirds; Mexico; Nectarivory; Niche partitioning

Categories

Funding

  1. COCYTEH-Hidalgo [FOMIX-Hgo-2008-01-95828]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) [89263, 91069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spatial and temporal variation in interactions between hummingbirds and plants have often been examined, and hummingbirds and insects are known to indirectly interact in networks of nectar plants. In a highland temperate forest in Hidalgo, Mexico some oak trees were heavily infested by honeydew-producing insects (family Margarodidae, tribe Xylococcini, genus Strigmacoccus) and the honeydew was consumed by hummingbirds. Here using survival analysis we investigate how the honeydew produced by dense populations of these margarodids is temporally and spatially partitioned by hummingbirds. We also measured the availability and quality of honeydew exudates, and then we recorded the time until a bird visited and used such resources. Four hummingbird species consumed this resource (Atthis eloisa, Hylocharis leucotis, Colibri thalassinus and Eugenes fulgens). Data from 294 hours of observation on seven focal trees suggested temporal and spatial segregation among visiting birds according to body size and territorial behavior during the most honeydew-limited time. Hummingbird species differed in the daily times they foraged, as well as in the location where honeydew-producing insects were visited on the trees. Temporal and spatial segregation among hummingbird species is interpreted as an adaptation to reduce the risk of aggressive encounters. This may facilitate multispecies coexistence and allow these birds to exploit honeydew more effectively [Current Zoology 57 (1): 56-62, 2011].

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available