4.5 Article

Alterations in Hippocampal Network Activity after In Vitro Traumatic Brain Injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 32, Issue 13, Pages 1011-1019

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2014.3667

Keywords

electrophysiology; hippocampus; network synchronization; traumatic brain injury

Funding

  1. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [DTNH22-08-C-00088]
  2. New Jersey Commission on Brain Injury Research [08-3209-BIR-E-1]
  3. Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative from the Army Research Office [W911MF-10-1-0526]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) alters function and behavior, which can be characterized by changes in electrophysiological function in vitro. A common cognitive deficit after mild-to-moderate TBI is disruption of persistent working memory, of which the in vitro correlate is long-lasting, neuronal network synchronization that can be induced pharmacologically by the gamma-aminobutyric acid A antagonist, bicuculline. We utilized a novel in vitro platform for TBI research, the stretchable microelectrode array (SMEA), to investigate the effects of TBI on bicuculline-induced, long-lasting network synchronization in the hippocampus. Mechanical stimulation significantly disrupted bicuculline-induced, long-lasting network synchronization 24h after injury, despite the continued ability of the injured neurons to fire, as revealed by a significant increase in the normalized spontaneous event rate in the dentate gyrus (DG) and CA1. A second challenge with bicuculline 24h after the first challenge significantly decreased the normalized spontaneous event rate in the DG. In addition, we illustrate the utility of the SMEA for TBI research by combining multiple experimental paradigms in one platform, which has the potential to enable novel investigations into the mechanisms responsible for functional consequences of TBI and speed the rate of drug discovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available