4.4 Review

Complete Response in 5 Out of 38 Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Stem Cell Differentiation Stage Factors: Case Reports from a Single Centre

Journal

CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 254-260

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/138920111794295855

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; advanced stage; systemic therapy; stem cells; biological response modifiers; sorafenib; targeted molecular therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the third cause of cancer-related death. Because HCC is multicentric with time, excluding the few transplanted patients, sooner or later it becomes untreatable with loco-regional therapies and, until some years ago, it was not responsive to systemic therapies. In 2005 a randomized trial indicated the efficacy of a product containing stem cell differentiation stage factors (SCDSF) taken from zebra fish embryos during the stage in which the totipotent stem cells are differentiating into the pluripotent adult stem cells. In such a trial the patients, with intermediate and advanced HCC according to BCLC/AASLD guidelines, presented benefit in terms of performance status (PS) and objective tumoral response, with some cases (2.4%) of complete response (CR). The aim of this cohort study is to report the experience of a tertiary referral center on the evidence of cases of CR in patients with advanced stage HCC treated with SCDSF as supportive care. CR was regarded as sustained disappearance of the neoplastic areas or blood supply therein, accompanied by normalization of AFP levels. Out of 49 patients consecutively recruited and retrospectively evaluated, 38 had advanced stage and 11 terminal stage. In 5 patients with advanced stage a sustained CR was reported (13.1%). Improvement on PS was obtained in 17 patients (34.6%). No side effects occurred. SCDSF treatment confirmed its efficacy in patients with advanced HCC, in terms of PS and tumoral response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available