4.1 Review

Beyond the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; the growing role of systems biology and stratified medicine

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 460-465

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e328363f4b7

Keywords

biomarkers; genomics; interstitial lung disease; transcriptomics; usual interstitial pneumonia

Funding

  1. GSK
  2. Actelion
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim
  4. InterMune
  5. Respironics
  6. Sanofi-Aventis
  7. UCB
  8. AstraZeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, invariably fatal condition with a median survival from diagnosis of only 3 years. Despite improvements in disease understanding, challenges remain in establishing a diagnosis and predicting prognosis in individual patients. Furthermore, limited understanding of the key pathogenetic mechanisms driving disease is hampering development of new therapies. This review outlines progress that has been made in applying systems biology to IPF and the insights into disease pathogenesis, diagnosis and monitoring that this research is providing.Recent findingsLarge-scale genome-wide association studies have highlighted polymorphisms in genes involved in epithelial integrity and host defense including MUC5B and TOLLIP. Whole blood transcriptomics points towards changes in immune cell regulation that influence the progression of fibrosis. Proteomic studies have identified serum proteins, including matrix metalloproteinase 7 and CC chemokine ligand (CCL)-18, which associate with disease severity and predict prognosis.SummaryUse of molecular research techniques in large populations of well-phenotyped patients is leading to major advances in understanding of IPF. As new treatments for IPF emerge, it is to be hoped that careful application of these findings will enable the targeting of therapy to individuals based on the predominant mechanisms driving progression of their disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available