4.1 Article

Screening for lung cancer: are we there yet?

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages 301-306

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32833aa01c

Keywords

low-dose computed tomography; lung cancer; randomized controlled trial; screening

Funding

  1. Danish Ministry of Interior and Health
  2. Italian Association for the Fight against Cancer (Lega Italiana per la Lotta contro i Tumori) - National Head Office and Milan Section

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review In lung cancer screening with low-dose spiral computed tomography (LDCT), the proportion of stage I disease is 50-85%, and the survival rate for resected stage I disease can exceed 90%, but proof of real benefit in terms of lung cancer mortality reduction must come from the several randomized trials underway in Europe and in the USA. Our purpose is to update the readers on recent progress in medical knowledge in this field. Recent findings Relevant novelties regarding technical and collateral aspects of lung cancer screening have been made available, covering the performance of detection systems and nodule evaluation protocols, means to increase cost-effectiveness, insight into the biology of lung cancer, promotion of minimally invasive and lung-sparing surgical options, effects of screening on smoking habits and early follow-up findings in one randomized trial of LDCT vs. clinical review. Conclusion Early follow-up data suggest that the effect of screening with LDCT on mortality might be smaller than expected, but definitive follow-up data are still awaited from all ongoing randomized trials. Lung cancer screening research is yielding a relevant body of medical knowledge that will be beneficial for other smoking-related diseases and contribute to a better understanding of lung cancer biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available