4.4 Review

Cardiovascular disease in Williams syndrome

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages 609-615

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000664

Keywords

anesthesia; cardiovascular; medical; surgery; Williams syndrome

Categories

Funding

  1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Williams syndrome is a multisystem disorder seen with some regularity at most pediatric centers and usually fairly often at larger centers. Cardiovascular abnormalities, because of elastin deficiency, are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with Williams syndrome. The present article presents a review of the most recent developments regarding the cardiovascular issues in Williams syndrome. Recent findings Cardiovascular abnormalities occur in 80% of patients with Williams syndrome, the majority of which are arterial stenoses. The stenoses seen in Williams syndrome now appear to arise from deficient circumferential arterial growth. Pharmacological therapies aimed at improving the vascular stenoses have shown some promise in animal models. Surgical outcomes for supravalvar aortic stenosis are good at most centers. Transcatheter interventions are largely ineffective in Williams syndrome. Multilevel surgical pulmonary artery reconstruction has excellent results for peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis. Periprocedural risk stratification and management algorithms may decrease the risk of cardiovascular complications. Summary Cardiovascular abnormalities are a major determining factor in the clinical picture and trajectory of patients with Williams syndrome. Advances in surgical techniques, medical therapeutic options, and periprocedural management hold promise for significant improvements in the cardiovascular outcomes of these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available