4.5 Article

B-cell-targeted treatment for multiple sclerosis: mechanism of action and clinical data

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages S19-S25

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.wco.0000313360.38306.ab

Keywords

autoimmune; B-cell-targeted; depletion; epratuzumab; multiple sclerosis; rituximab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strategies for treating autoimmune disorders are increasingly employing targeted therapies rather than non-specific, multitargeted treatments. Accumulating evidence on the involvement of B lymphocytes in the pathophysiology of autoimmune demyelinating disease has led to a renewed interest in B cells as potential therapeutic targets. In particular, antigen presentation between B cells and T cells, increased trafficking of B cells across the blood-brain barrier, and autoantibodies produced by plasma cells may contribute to the pathophysiology of autoimmune disorders such as multiple sclerosis. Several B-cell-targeted, depletion therapies are currently in development, including rituximab, epratuzumab, diphtheria toxin-single chain Fv (DC2219), belimumab, atacicept, abatacept, and abetimus sodium. Of these agents, only rituximab and abatacept have been evaluated in multiple sclerosis patients. Preliminary results of a phase II trial of rituximab in multiple sclerosis suggest that rituximab is well tolerated and significantly reduces the number of gadolinium enhancing lesions over 24 weeks of treatment. Results of an exploratory analysis suggest the potential promise of abatacept 10 mg/kg for multiple sclerosis. It is expected that future clinical trials will establish a role for B-cell-targeted therapies in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune neurological diseases. This article describes the mechanism of action behind B-cell-targeted depletion therapies in development and reviews available clinical data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available