4.2 Review

Do mantle cell lymphomas have an 'Achilles heel'?

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 350-357

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000057

Keywords

B-cell lymphoma 2; B-cell receptor; cyclin-D1; ibrutinib; mantle cell lymphoma

Categories

Funding

  1. intramural research program of the Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a mature B-cell malignancy that continues to have a high mortality rate. In this article, we discuss key pathogenic pathways in MCL biology and their possible therapeutic targeting. Recent findings In addition to cyclin-D1, the transcription factor SOX-11 emerged as a common characteristic of MCL. Genomic studies have identified a number of recurrently mutated genes; in order of descending frequency these include ATM, CCND1, UBR5, TP53, BIRC3, NOTCH1/2 and TRAF2. However, no clear oncogenic driver has been identified. In contrast, several observations indicate that MCL cells are antigen-experienced cells and that the tumor microenvironment and B-cell receptor engagement are important. This is underscored by the impressive clinical responses achieved with the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib. Recently identified activating mutations in the noncanonical nuclear factor-kappa B pathway could give rise to ibrutinib resistance. Poly-ADP ribose polymerase and aurora kinase inhibitors may be synthetic lethal with the common aberrations in DNA damage pathways found in MCL. Also, ABT-199, a potent and selective inhibitor of B-cell lymphoma 2, has promising activity in early studies. Summary MCL is a heterogeneous disease, and no single Achilles heel has been identified. Nevertheless, genomic, molecular and clinical studies have revealed vulnerabilities that can be exploited for effective therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available