4.1 Review

Food allergy: a glimpse into the inner workings of gut immunology

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 99-103

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32834e7b60

Keywords

CD103(+) dendritic cell; forkhead box protein-3; oral tolerance; regulatory T cell; secretory IgA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review How food protein becomes recognized as an allergen remains a fundamental question. Previous studies indicated that the pathophysiology of food allergy is because of a skewed Th2 response to specific food glycoproteins. The focus has now shifted to understanding how a failure of regulatory mechanisms results in food allergy. This review summarizes the recent findings elucidating the small intestine's role in the pathophysiology of food allergy and the immune mechanisms of oral tolerance. Recent findings Gut homeostasis and immunity occur via a complex interplay of innate and adaptive immune responses. Immune exclusion is performed mainly by secretory IgA, although there are back-up mechanisms in place to induce oral tolerance when secretory IgA is lacking. Oral tolerance cannot occur in murine models lacking T regulatory cells, for which Foxp3(+) is a key marker. Migration of Foxp3(+) T cells from the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) to the lamina propria occurs via gut-homing signals. Also in the MLNs are CD103(+) dendritic cells, which drive the differentiation of Foxp3(+) T cells in the presence of TGF-beta and retinoic acid produced from dietary vitamin A. Lastly, microenvironmental signals from the microbiome can serve to enhance these interactions. Summary We have focused primarily on local immunologic variables that may affect the induction of oral tolerance in the gut and the mechanisms elucidated in animal models. However, many other variables such as genetics, commensal microbiota, and diet are likely to be important factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available