4.1 Article

Colon cancer screening and surveillance controversies

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 422-427

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32832d1e2a

Keywords

colonoscopy; colorectal cancer screening; computed tomographic colonography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review To discuss new colorectal cancer screening tests and highlight controversies regarding colon screening and surveillance. Recent findings New screening guidelines were published in 2008. Tests that primarily detect early cancer include sensitive guaiac fecal occult blood test or fecal immunochemical test. Tests that can detect both early cancer and cancer precursor lesions include sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. One guideline endorses the use of computed tomographic colonography. Limitations of each test are highlighted in the new guidelines. Controversies include age to start screening, age to stop Screening, and appropriate interval after a negative screening colonoscopy. New work has raised some doubt about the protective effect of colonoscopy in the proximal colon. Finally, there is new emphasis on the quality of screening programs. Summary Colorectal cancer screening can reduce both incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer if performed with high quality. New work should focus on improving the quality of all screening programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available