4.1 Review

Genetic testing in cardiovascular diseases

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 235-240

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000055

Keywords

cardiovascular disease; congenital heart disease; gene testing; genetics; genomics

Funding

  1. NIH [U01 HG006500]
  2. Leducq Foundation Transatlantic Network Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of reviewThe review is designed to outline the major developments in genetic testing in the cardiovascular arena in the past year or so. This is an exciting time in genetic testing as whole exome and whole genome approaches finally reach the clinic. These new approaches offer insight into disease causation in families in which this might previously have been inaccessible, and also bring a wide range of interpretative challenges.Recent findingsAmong the most significant recent findings has been the extent of physiologic rare coding variation in the human genome. New disease genes have been identified through whole exome studies in neonatal arrhythmia, congenital heart disease and coronary artery disease that were simply inaccessible with other techniques. This has not only shed light on the challenges of genetic testing at this scale, but has also sharply defined the limits of prior gene-panel focused testing. As novel therapies targeting specific genetic subsets of disease become available, genetic testing will become a part of routine clinical care.SummaryThe pace of change in sequencing technologies has begun to transform clinical medicine, and cardiovascular disease is no exception. The complexity of such studies emphasizes the importance of real-time communication between the genetics laboratory and genetically informed clinicians. New efforts in data and knowledge management will be central to the continued advancement of genetic testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available