4.1 Review

Reductions in cardiovascular risk after bariatric surgery

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 555-561

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32834b7fc4

Keywords

bariatric surgery; cardiovascular risk factors; diabetes; dyslipidemia; hypertension; obesity; weight loss

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK055006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Obesity is commonly associated with multiple conditions imparting adverse cardiovascular risk, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance or diabetes. In addition, sleep disordered breathing, inflammation, left ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial enlargement, and subclinical left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction may collectively contribute to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This review will describe improvements in cardiovascular risk factors after bariatric surgery. Recent findings All of the cardiovascular risk factors listed above are improved or even resolved after bariatric surgery. Cardiac structure and function also have shown consistent improvement after surgically induced weight loss. The amount of improvement in cardiac risk factors is generally proportional to the amount of weight lost. The degree of weight loss varies with different bariatric procedures. On the basis of the improvement in risk profiles, it has been predicted that progression of atherosclerosis could be slowed and the 10-year risk of cardiac events would decline by similar to 50% in patients undergoing weight loss surgery. In keeping with these predictions, two studies have demonstrated reductions in 10-year total and cardiovascular mortality of approximately 50% in patients who had bariatric surgery. Summary These encouraging data support the continued, and perhaps expanded, use of surgical procedures to induce weight loss in severely obese patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available