4.1 Review

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: how does this perform in high-risk patients?

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 118-122

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328343983a

Keywords

aortic valve replacement; high risk; minimally invasive aortic valve replacement; minimally invasive valve surgery; minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Minimally invasive techniques are increasingly important in aortic valve surgery. The aim of this publication is to review our experience and recent literature to assess and present the current 'state-of-the-art'-role of minimally invasive aortic valve operations for high-risk patients. Recent findings Minimally invasive aortic valve operation for high-risk patients (e.g. patients with left ventricular dysfunction, reoperation, elderly, multimorbid patients, etc.) can be performed with an operative mortality similar to standard sternotomy approach. Less postoperative bleeding, fewer blood transfusions, better cosmesis, lower ICU and in-hospital stays as well as the absence of sternal wound infection are the main advantages of this technique. Summary Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery has evolved into a well tolerated, efficient surgical treatment option in experienced centers, providing greater patient satisfaction and lower complication rates in high-risk patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available