4.1 Review

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: an updated review

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 555-559

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328311f254

Keywords

pulmonary arteriopathy; pulmonary embolism; pulmonary endarterectomy; thrombus organization; venous thromboembolism

Funding

  1. European Commission [LSHM-CT-2005-018725]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Venous thromboembolism is a spectrum of disease comprising deep vein thrombosis, thrombus in transit, acute pulmonary embolism, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) as a rare and late possible sequela. Recent findings On the basis of a prospective long-term study, the incidence of CTEPH is estimated at 3.8% within 2 years of all patients surviving an episode of symptomatic idiopathic pulmonary embolism. Young age, a large perfusion defect, and idiopathic clinical presentation are associated with a higher probability of CTEPH. Current pathophysiological concepts suggest a misguided thrombus resolution process that is triggered by infection, inflammation, autoimmunity, and malignancy. Diagnosis and therapy of CTEPH are interdisciplinary achievements and nowadays still based on a positive lung perfusion scan and for assessment of operability on a classical pulmonary angiography. Treatment of choice is surgical pulmonary endarterectomy of the pulmonary obstructions, which leads to restoration of normal pulmonary hemodynamics at rest in nearly 80% of patients. In expert centers, surgical mortality is under 10%. Summary CTEPH has emerged as a 'dual' pulmonary vascular disorder with major vessel vascular remodeling of thrombus organization, combined with a small vessel pulmonary arteriopathy that is a target for classic vasodilator treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available