4.1 Review

Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: a contemporary review of the literature

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 128-140

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f4db7a

Keywords

bundles; early goal-directed therapy; hemodynamic optimization; protocols; resuscitation; sepsis; septic shock; severe sepsis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease
  2. Biosite (Inverness)
  3. Edwards Lifesciences
  4. Hutchinson Technologies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Aggressive approaches to acute diseases such as acute myocardial infarction, trauma and stroke have improved outcomes. Early goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock represents a similar approach. An analysis of the literature assessing external validity and generalizability of this intervention is lacking. Recent findings Eleven peer-reviewed publications (1569 patients) and 28 abstracts (4429 patients) after the original early goal-directed therapy study were identified from academic, community and international settings. These publications total 5998 patients (3042 before and 2956 after early goal-directed therapy). The mean age, sex, APACHE II scores and mortality were similar across all studies. The mean relative and absolute risk reduction was 0.46 +/- 26% and 20.3 +/- 12.7%, respectively. These findings are superior to the original early goal-directed therapy trial which showed figures of 34% and 16%, respectively. A consistent and similar decrease in healthcare resource consumption was also found. Summary Early goal-directed therapy modulates systemic inflammation and results in significant reductions in morbidity, mortality, and healthcare resource consumption. Early goal-directed therapy has been externally validated and is generalizable across multiple healthcare settings. Because of these robust findings, further emphasis should be placed on overcoming logistical, institutional, and professional barriers to implementation which can save the life of one of every six patients presenting with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available