Characterization and Comparison of Bacterial Communities Selected in Conventional Activated Sludge and Membrane Bioreactor Pilot Plants: A Focus on Nitrospira and Planctomycetes Bacterial Phyla
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Characterization and Comparison of Bacterial Communities Selected in Conventional Activated Sludge and Membrane Bioreactor Pilot Plants: A Focus on Nitrospira and Planctomycetes Bacterial Phyla
Authors
Keywords
Pilot Plant, Anammox Bacterium, Mixed Liquor, Chimeric Sequence, Solid Retention Time
Journal
CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 77-90
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-02-19
DOI
10.1007/s00284-013-0333-6
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Effect of ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) kinetics on bioaugmentation
- (2012) Giulio Munz et al. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
- Winery wastewater treatment for water reuse purpose: Conventional activated sludge versus membrane bioreactor (MBR)
- (2012) C. Valderrama et al. DESALINATION
- Analysis of microbial communities developed on the fouling layers of a membrane-coupled anaerobic bioreactor applied to wastewater treatment
- (2011) Kadiya Calderón et al. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
- Bacterial community structure and enzyme activities in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) using pure oxygen as an aeration source
- (2011) Kadiya Calderón et al. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
- Endocrine disrupting compounds: A comparison of removal between conventional activated sludge and membrane bioreactors
- (2011) V. Cases et al. DESALINATION
- Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor
- (2011) E. Sahar et al. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- The effect of organic loading on bacterial community composition of membrane biofilms in a submerged polyvinyl chloride membrane bioreactor
- (2010) Siqing Xia et al. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
- Bacterial community dynamics in a functionally stable pilot-scale wastewater treatment plant
- (2010) Xiaohui Wang et al. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
- Microbial community structures in conventional activated sludge system and membrane bioreactor (MBR)
- (2010) Seung Hyuk Baek et al. BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING
- Energy audit of a full scale MBR system
- (2010) A. Fenu et al. DESALINATION
- Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors—Characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures
- (2010) Anja Drews JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
- Activated sludge model (ASM) based modelling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: A critical review with special regard to MBR specificities
- (2010) A. Fenu et al. WATER RESEARCH
- Modeling the decay of ammonium oxidizing bacteria
- (2010) Giulio Munz et al. WATER RESEARCH
- Monitoring and analysis of the energy cost of an MBR
- (2009) J.A. Gil et al. DESALINATION
- Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes
- (2009) B. J. Tindall et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY
- Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge
- (2009) Delphine Rivière et al. ISME Journal
- Process efficiency and microbial monitoring in MBR (membrane bioreactor) and CASP (conventional activated sludge process) treatment of tannery wastewater
- (2008) Giulio Munz et al. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
- Activated sludge operational regime has significant impact on the type of nitrifying community and its nitrification rates
- (2008) Magdalena A. Dytczak et al. WATER RESEARCH
- Characterization of the loosely attached fraction of activated sludge bacteria
- (2007) Fernando Morgan-Sagastume et al. WATER RESEARCH
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started