4.3 Article

Prevention of episodic migraine with topiramate: a prospective 24-week, open-label, flexible-dose clinical trial with optional 24 weeks follow-up in a community setting

Journal

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 1119-1129

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1185/03007991003676461

Keywords

HIT-6; MIDAS; Migraine prevention; Open-label trial; Topiramate

Funding

  1. Janssen-Cilag, Neuss, Germany
  2. Mundipharma
  3. BiogenIdec
  4. Pfizer
  5. Wyeth
  6. MSD
  7. Berlin-Chemie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To explore efficacy and safety outcomes of topiramate for episodic migraine prevention in community practice. Research design and methods: Open-label, multicenter, flexible-dose clinical trial consisting of a 4-week baseline phase, 24-week core phase and an optional 24-week follow-up phase in patients (18-80 years) with episodic migraine treated in community practices outside tertiary care centers. Main outcome measures: The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the number of migraine days/28 days (baseline vs. the last 4 weeks of core treatment) Secondary efficacy parameters included aspects of quality of life (QoL) and subjective patient ratings. Results: A total of 360 patients entered the core phase (ITT population); 37.6% (97 patients) discontinued prematurely, mainly due to adverse events (AEs; 23.6%). Mean topiramate dosage was 90 mg/day. Migraine days decreased from 8.30/28 days to 5.65/28 days and QoL (HIT-6 and MIDAS) was improved. Efficacy, tolerability and satisfaction were rated as 'good' or better by 56, 61 and 63% of patients, respectively. A total of 321 of 364 patients (88.2%) reported at least one treatment emergent AE, and the most common during the core phase were paraesthesia (46.4% of 364 patients), fatigue (17.0%), nausea (15.4%), dizziness (12.9%), viral infection (12.9%), weight decrease (12.6%) and impaired concentration (10.2%). Of 227 patients completing the core phase, 199 (88%) participated in the follow-up phase. A total of 187 patients received topiramate and 38 (20.3%) of these stopped treatment prematurely due to insufficient efficacy (6.4%), AEs (4.8%) or other reasons (10.2%). Reduction in migraine days and improvements in QoL (HIT-6) were maintained or improved (MIDAS) during follow-up, and 84% rated their satisfaction with topiramate therapy as 'good to very good'. Conclusions: This community practice study showed that long-term treatment with topiramate in the prevention of episodic migraine was effective and well-tolerated, and it was associated with clinically relevant improvements in several aspects of QoL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available