4.8 Article

Phenotypic Transformation Affects Associative Learning in the Desert Locust

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 23, Pages 2407-2412

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/33278/2007]
  2. Royal Society
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H002537/1]
  4. Leverhulme Trust [F/09 364/K]
  5. BBSRC [BB/H002537/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H002537/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/33278/2007] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In desert locusts, increased population densities drive phenotypic transformation from the solitarious to the gregarious phase within a generation [1-4]. Here we show that when presented with odor-food associations, the two extreme phases differ in aversive but not appetitive associative learning, with solitarious locusts showing a conditioned aversion more quickly than gregarious locusts. The acquisition of new learned aversions was blocked entirely in acutely crowded solitarious (transiens) locusts, whereas appetitive learning and prior learned associations were unaffected. These differences in aversive learning support phase-specific feeding strategies. Associative training with hyoscyamine, a plant alkaloid found in the locusts' habitat [5, 6], elicits a phase-dependent odor preference: solitarious locusts avoid an odor associated with hyoscyamine, whereas gregarious locusts do not. Remarkably, when solitarious locusts are crowded and then reconditioned with the odor-hyoscyamine pairing as transiens, the specific blockade of aversive acquisition enables them to override their prior aversive memory with an appetitive one. Under fierce food competition, as occurs during crowding in the field, this provides a neuroecological mechanism enabling locusts to reassign an appetitive value to an odor that they learned previously to avoid.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available