Journal
CRYOBIOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 250-260Publisher
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.02.008
Keywords
Osmotic response; Dimethyl sulfoxide; Ethylene glycol; Cryomicroscopy; Cryopreservation; Image processing; Computer vision
Categories
Funding
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [EXC 62/1]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Cellular response during the freeze-thaw process strongly affects the cryopreservation outcome including cell morphology and cell viability. Cryomicroscopy was used to individually analyze the osmotic response of human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HPMECs) during slow cooling (1 degrees C/min) to -60 degrees C and fast rewarming to 4 degrees C (100 degrees C/min). The ice nucleation temperature was controlled (T-n = -8 degrees C). Different concentrations of different cryoprotectant agents, dimethyl sulfoxide, ethylene glycol, proline, ectoin, and trehalose resulted in various cell volume changes. The described methods for image processing and computer vision allows for a fully automatic and individual analysis of the osmotically driven cell response under a temporal resolution of 2 frames per second. As a result, we show that in the presence of dimethyl sulfoxide or ethylene glycol cells shrink during cooling to a high degree, especially at intermediate molar concentrations in the range between 0 and 2 M, while during rewarming cells swell to isotonic volumes gradually. Comparative cell vitality tests, membrane integrity, and viability tests after 24 h recultivation, under these conditions show a high cell survival. In the absence of cryoprotective agents or with proline, ectoin or trehalose, osmotic shrinkage did not meet our expectations: a freeze-induced swelling was detected during cooling and an extreme swelling was observed after rewarming, which was accompanied by lower comparative cell viability. A linear correlation between the cellular membrane integrity after cryopreservation and the maximal relative cell volume was derived (R-2 = 96). The results clearly show that it is crucial to analyze cells within a sample individually due to their individual different osmotic response. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available