4.6 Article

Sleep in Hypercapnic Critical Care Patients Under Noninvasive Ventilation: Conventional Versus Dedicated Ventilators

Journal

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 60-68

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826764e3

Keywords

acute respiratory failure; ICU; noninvasive ventilation; patient-ventilator asynchrony; polysomnography; sleep

Funding

  1. Philips Respironics
  2. Fundacio La Caixa
  3. Societat Catalana de Pneumologia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To compare sleep quality between two types of ventilators commonly used for noninvasive ventilation: conventional ICU ventilators and dedicated noninvasive ventilators; and to evaluate sleep during and between noninvasive ventilation sessions in critically ill patients: Design: Physiological sleep study with a randomized assessment of the ventilator type. Setting: Medical ICU in a university hospital. Patients: Twenty-four patients admitted for acute hypercapnic re. spiratory failure requiring noninvasive ventilation. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive noninvasive ventilation with either an ICU ventilators (n = 12) or a dedicated. noninvasive ventilators (n = 12), and their sleep and respiratory parameters were recorded by polysomnography from 4 PM to 9 AM on the second, third, or fourth day after noninvasive ventilation initiation. Measurements and Main Results: Sleep architecture was similar between ventilator groups, including sleep fragmentation (number of arousals and awakenings/hr), but the dedicated noninvasive ventilators group showed a higher patient-ventilator asynchrony-related fragmentation (28% [17-44] vs. 14% [7.0-22]; p = 0.02), whereas the ICU ventilators group exhibited a higher noise-related fragmentation. Ineffective efforts were more frequent in the dedicated noninvasive ventilators group than in the ICU ventilators group (34 ineffective efforts/hr of sleep [15-125] vs. two [0-13]; p < 0.01), possibly as a result of a higher tidal volume (7.2 mL/kg [6.7-8.8] vs. 5.8 [5.1-6.8]; p = 0.04). More sleep time occurred and sleep quality was better during noninvasive ventilation sessions than during spontaneous breathing periods (p < 0.05) as a result of greater slow wave and rapid eye movement sleep and lower fragmentation. Conclusions: There were no observed differences in sleep quality corresponding to the type of ventilator used despite slight differences in patient-ventilator asynchrony. Noninvasive ventilation sessions did not prevent patients from sleeping; on the contrary, they seem to aid sleep when compared with unassisted breathing. (Crit Care Med 2013; 41:60-68)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available