4.1 Article

Association of depression with adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention

Journal

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 589-595

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283650234

Keywords

coronary disease; depression; revascularization

Funding

  1. Research on Application and Development of the Characteristics of the Capital, Beijing, PR China [Z07050700690711]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the impact of depression on the clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).MethodsA total of 400 patients treated with PCI were assessed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview 1 day before and 2 weeks after the procedure. All patients were followed up for 3 years after the procedure. The primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) including mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization.ResultsDepression was present in 38.5% (n=154) of patients after the procedure, which was significantly higher than that before the procedure (25.5%, P<0.001). Patients with postprocedure depression had a higher rate of MACE (27.3 vs. 13.0%, P<0.001), mortality (5.8 vs. 2.0%, P=0.044), and repeat revascularization (13.0 vs. 6.5%, P=0.027) compared with patients without depression during the 3 years of follow-up. After adjustment for other factors that affect cardiovascular outcomes, postprocedure depression was seen to be an independent predictor of 3-year MACE [hazard ratio: 2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57-4.02, P<0.001], mortality (3.60, 95% CI: 1.16-11.22, P=0.027), and repeat revascularization (hazard ratio: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.09-4.51, P=0.029).ConclusionDepression is common among patients treated with PCI. Postprocedure depression is an independent predictor of 3-year MACE, mortality, and repeat revascularization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available