4.1 Article

Brain natriuretic peptide in apical ballooning syndrome (Takotsubo/stress cardiomyopathy): comparison with acute myocardial infarction

Journal

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 259-264

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283526a57

Keywords

apical ballooning syndrome; brain natriuretic peptide; stress cardiomyopathy; Takotsubo cardiomyopathy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives Apical ballooning syndrome (ABS) is a transient cause of ventricular dysfunction. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and hemodynamic correlates of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in ABS and compare the biomarker profiles in ABS with acute myocardial infarction controls. Methods Fifty-seven prospectively diagnosed patients with ABS whose BNP and troponin T level measurements were available were included. Fifty patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 25 individuals with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) were included as matched controls. Results In the ABS cohort, the BNP levels were higher in patients older than 65 years compared with younger individuals: 767 (269, 951) versus 340 (131, 904.5), P = 0.019. There were no significant correlations between BNP levels and hemodynamic parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction and end diastolic pressure. There were no correlations between BNP and peak troponin T (r = 0.03, P = 0.8). BNP levels were significantly higher in ABS patients when compared with the STEMI and NSTEMI controls. The BNP to peak troponin T ratio was significantly higher in ABS compared with the STEMI controls 1089.4 (446.7, 3334.8) versus 97.4 (17.9, 264.7), P = 0.04. Conclusion BNP elevation is almost universal in ABS. Cardiac hemodynamic indices do not correlate with BNP levels. The magnitude of BNP elevation is higher in ABS compared with STEMI and NSTEMI. Coron Artery Dis 23: 259-264 (C) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Coronary Artery Disease 2012, 23: 259-264

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available