4.1 Article

Low lymphocyte count in acute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction predicts long-term recurrent myocardial infarction

Journal

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 1-7

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328332ee15

Keywords

lymphocyte count; reinfarction; ST-segment myocardial infarction

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, RED HERACLES Madrid, Spain [RD06/0009/1001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective We sought to determine the relationship between the lowest lymphocyte count (lymphocyte(min)) obtained within the first 96 h of symptoms onset and the risk of postdischarge recurrent spontaneous myocardial infarction (re-MI) in patients admitted with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI). Methods We analyzed 549 consecutive patients admitted with STEMI from a single academic hospital. Lymphocyte counts were determined at admission and routinely during the first 96 h. Lymphocyte(min) was selected as the main exposure. Patients with inflammatory or infectious diseases, in-hospital death, or reinfarction were excluded from the analysis (final sample=426 patients). Lymphocyte(min) was divided into quartiles (Q) and their association with re-MI was assessed by competing risk analysis. Postdischarge death and coronary revascularization were considered competing events. Results During a median follow-up of 36 months, 53 re-MI (12.4%) were registered. The re-MI crude rate was significantly higher in patients in the lowest lymphocyte(min) quartile (Q1 <= 1045 cells/ml) compared with Q2-Q4: 22.4, 9.4, 8.4, 9.4%, respectively; P=0.005. In a multivariate setting, Q1 was also associated with a significant increased risk of re-MI compared with Q2-Q4 (hazard ratio: 2.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-3.76; P=0.021). Conclusion Low lymphocyte count obtained within the first 96 h of a STEMI predicts the risk of re-MI. Coron Artery Dis 21:1-7 (C) 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available