4.1 Article

Anemia is a Mortality Predictor in Hospitalized Patients for COPD Exacerbation

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/15412555.2011.647131

Keywords

Previous exacerbations; Anemia; Prognostic factor; Survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Anemia is a recognized prognostic factor in many chronic illnesses, but there is limited information about its impact on outcomes in patients hospitalized for acute COPD exacerbation (AECOPD). Aim. To investigate whether anemia exerts an effect on mortality in patients admitted for AECOPD after one year of follow-up. Methods. From November 2007 to November 2009 we recruited 117 patients who required hospitalization due to an AECOPD. Clinical, functional and laboratory parameters on admission were prospectively assessed. Patients were followed up during one year. Mortality and days-to-death were collected. Results. Mean age 72 (SD +/- 9); FEV1 37.4 (SD +/- 12); mortality after 1 year was 22.2%. Mean survival: 339 days. Comparing patients who died to those who survived we found significant differences (p < 0,000) in hemoglobin (Hb) (12.4 vs 13.8 mg/dl) and hematocrit (Ht) (38 vs 41%). Anemia (Hb < 13 g.dl(-1)) prevalence was 33%. Those who died had experienced 3.5 exacerbations in previous year vs 1.5 exacerbations in the case of the survivors (p = 0.000). Lung function and nutritional status were similar, except for percentage of muscle mass (%) (35 vs 39%; p = 0.015) and albumin (33 vs 37mg/dl; p = 0.039). These variables were included in a Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Model; anemia and previous exacerbations resulted as independent factors for mortality. Mortality risk for patients with anemia was 5.9(CI: 1.9-19); for patients with > 1 exacerbation in the previous year was 5.9(CI: 1.3-26.5). Conclusion. Anemia and previous exacerbations were independent predictors of mortality after one year in patients hospitalized for AECOPD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available