4.3 Article

What matters most? The content and concordance of patients' and providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making

Journal

CONTRACEPTION
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 280-287

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.012

Keywords

Contraception; Shared decision making; Family planning; Patient education; Patient-centered care; Needs assessment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective(s): The objective of this study was to identify women's and health care providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making and counseling, respectively. Study Design: Cross-sectional surveys were administered online to convenience samples of 417 women and 188 contraceptive care providers residing in the United States. Participants were provided with a list of 34 questions related to the features of contraceptive options and rated the importance of each. Participants also ranked the questions in descending order of importance. For both women and providers, we calculated the mean importance rating for each question and the proportion that ranked each question in their three most important questions. Results: The average importance ratings given by women and providers were similar for 18 questions, but dissimilar for the remaining 16 questions. The question rated most important for women was How does it work to prevent pregnancy? whereas, for providers, How often does a patient need to remember to use it? and How is it used? were rated equally. The eight questions most frequently selected in the top three by women and/or providers were related to the safety of the method, mechanism of action, mode of use, side effects, typical- and perfect-use effectiveness, frequency of administration and when it begins to prevent pregnancy. Conclusion(s): Although we found considerable concordance between women's and provider's information priorities, the presence of some inconsistencies highlights the importance of patient-centered contraceptive counseling and, in particular, shared contraceptive decision making. Implications: This study provides insights into the information priorities of women for their contraceptive decision making and health care providers for contraceptive counseling. These insights are critical both to inform the development of decision support tools for implementation in contraceptive care and to guide the delivery of patient-centered care. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Investigation of factors influencing the implementation of two shared decision-making interventions in contraceptive care: a qualitative interview study among clinical and administrative staff

Sarah Munro, Ruth Manski, Kyla Z. Donnelly, Daniela Agusti, Gabrielle Stevens, Michelle Banach, Maureen B. Boardman, Pearl Brady, Chrissy Colon Bradt, Tina Foster, Deborah J. Johnson, Judy Norsigian, Melissa Nothnagle, Heather L. Shepherd, Lisa Stern, Lyndal Trevena, Glyn Elwyn, Rachel Thompson

IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2019)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Variations in outcomes for women admitted to hospital in early versus active labour: an observational study

Yvette D. Miller, Ashleigh A. Armanasco, Laura McCosker, Rachel Thompson

BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH (2020)

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

Promise and perils of patient decision aids for reducing low-value care

Rachel Thompson, Danielle M. Muscat, Jesse Jansen, Darlene Cox, Joshua R. Zadro, Adrian C. Traeger, Kirsten McCaffery

BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY (2021)

Article Nursing

A survey of health care practitioners' attitudes toward shared decision-making for choice of next birth after cesarean

Sarah Munro, Elizabeth S. Wilcox, Leah K. Lambert, Monica Norena, Sarah Kaufman, Jana Encinger, Tamil Kendall, Rachel Thompson

Summary: The study found no significant association between hospital size and medico-legal concerns regarding mode of birth. Environmental factors that may influence SDM use include the time it takes to initiate an emergency cesarean and when the SDM intervention is introduced. Participants preferred an SDM approach where the pregnant person is involved in making the final decision for mode of birth.

BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Encounter decision aids to facilitate shared decision-making with women experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding or symptomatic uterine fibroids: A before-after study

Johanna W. M. Aarts, Rachel Thompson, Shama S. Alam, Michelle Dannenberg, Glyn Elwyn, Tina C. Foster

Summary: The study found that the level of shared decision-making (SDM) significantly increased after the introduction of an SDM package. Women patients reported higher satisfaction with shared decision-making, and the level of SDM by clinicians also improved. This study provides opportunities for implementing SDM packages in different types of organizations.

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING (2021)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Addressing Conflicts of Interest in Health and Medicine: Current Evidence and Implications for Patient Decision Aid Development

Rachel Thompson, Zoe Paskins, Barry G. Main, Thaddeus Mason Pope, Evelyn C. Y. Chan, Ben W. Moulton, Michael J. Barry, Clarence H. Braddock

Summary: This narrative review examined the effects of conflict of interest management strategies and patients' perspectives on conflicts of interest. The evidence showed significant noncompliance with prevailing requirements on conflict of interest management strategies, and highlighted the diverse views of patients on the acceptability of conflicts of interest, as well as the importance of conflict type and monetary value to patients. However, no research on the effects of IPDAS Collaboration conflict of interest quality standards on patient decision making or outcomes was identified.

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING (2021)

Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

The International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration: Evidence Update 2.0

Dawn Stacey, Robert J. Volk, Hilary Bekker, Karina Dahl Steffensen, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Kirsten McCaffery, Rachel Thompson, Richard Thomson, Lyndal Trevena, Trudy van der Weijden, Holly Witteman

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Development of a patient decision aid on subacromial decompression surgery and rotator cuff repair surgery: an international mixed-methods study

Joshua Zadro, Caitlin Jones, Ian Harris, Rachelle Buchbinder, Denise A. O'Connor, Kirsten McCaffery, Rachel Elizabeth Thompson, Sascha Karunaratne, Min Jiat Teng, Christopher Maher, Tammy Hoffmann

Summary: The study developed a patient decision aid for people with subacromial pain syndrome, providing evidence-based information on surgical options. Most health professionals and patients rated the decision aid as acceptable and useful, with consensus on most aspects but also some controversial points.

BMJ OPEN (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

The impact of a patient decision aid on intention to undergo surgery for subacromial pain syndrome: An online randomised controlled trial

Joshua R. Zadro, Sascha Karunaratne, Ian A. Harris, Caitlin M. P. Jones, Mary O'Keeffe, Giovanni E. Ferreira, Rachelle Buchbinder, Kirsten McCaffery, Rachel Thompson, Christopher G. Maher, Tammy Hoffmann

Summary: This online trial evaluated the effects of a patient decision aid for individuals considering shoulder surgery. The results showed that the decision aid had no impact on treatment intention, attitudes, informed choice, and decisional conflict, but had a small effect on improving knowledge.

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING (2022)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

Community awareness and use of anti-Mullerian hormone testing in Australia: a population survey of women

Tessa Copp, Rachel Thompson, Jenny Doust, Karin Hammarberg, Michelle Peate, Sarah Lensen, Erin Cvejic, Devora Lieberman, Ben W. Mol, Kirsten J. McCaffery

Summary: A survey in Australia finds that only 13% of women have heard of the anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) test, and only 7% have undergone the test. The top reasons for testing include infertility investigations (51%), considering pregnancy and wanting to understand chances (19%), and finding out if a medical condition affected fertility (11%).

HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study

Jan F. L. Gan, Marnee J. McKay, Caitlin M. P. Jones, Ian A. Harris, Kirsten McCaffery, Rachel Thompson, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Sam Adie, Christopher G. Maher, Joshua R. Zadro

Summary: This study developed a patient decision aid to portray the benefits and harms of non-surgical management and surgery for Achilles tendon ruptures, and conducted user-testing. The results showed that the decision aid was acceptable to both patients and health professionals. However, there were differing views among health professionals on details such as Achilles tendon retraction distance, factors modifying harm risks, treatment protocols, and evidence on benefits and harms.

BMJ OPEN (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Randomized Trial of the Choosing Wisely Consumer Questions and a Shared Decision-Making Video Intervention on Decision-Making Outcomes

Danielle Marie Muscat, Rachel Thompson, Erin Cvejic, Jenna Smith, Edward Hoi-fan Chang, Marguerite Tracy, Joshua Zadro, Robyn Lindner, Kirsten J. J. McCaffery

Summary: This study evaluated the impact of Choosing Wisely questions on consumers' decision-making outcomes. The results showed that both the Choosing Wisely questions and a shared decision-making preparation video increased intention to engage in shared decision-making, with the combination of both interventions having the greatest effect.

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING (2023)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Websites Selling Direct-to-Consumer Anti-Mullerian Hormone Tests

Alexis Johnson, Rachel Thompson, Brooke Nickel, Patti Shih, Karin Hammarberg, Tessa Copp

Summary: This study analyzed the information on websites selling direct-to-consumer AMH tests and found that most websites included false and misleading claims, leading consumers to believe that the test can reliably predict fertility potential and age of menopause. This may result in misplaced anxiety or reassurance about fertility and affect subsequent conception plans and behavior.

JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Measuring Patient Experiences of Integration in Health Care Delivery: Psychometric Validation of IntegRATE Under Controlled Conditions

Rachel Thompson, Gabrielle Stevens, Glyn Elwyn

Summary: This study assessed the psychometric properties of IntegRATE, including discriminative, concurrent, and divergent validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness. The study found that the IntegRATE sum score performed better than the top score, demonstrating encouraging results.

JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE (2021)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Healthcare providers' perceptions of the challenges and opportunities to engage Chinese migrant women in contraceptive counselling: a qualitative interview study

Hankiz Dolan, Mu Li, Deborah Bateson, Rachel Thompson, Chun Wah Michael Tam, Carissa Bonner, Lyndal Trevena

SEXUAL HEALTH (2020)

No Data Available