4.5 Article

Grain-size effect of biogenic silica in the surface sediments of the East China Sea

Journal

CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 29-37

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2014.03.005

Keywords

Biogenic silica; Size-fraction; Diatom; Surface sediment; ECS

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41376055, 41030856]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of People's Republic of China [2010CB951202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biogenic silica (BSi) is an important parameter for understanding biogeochemical processes and paleoceanographic records in the ocean, but this proxy still has many challenges when used to reconstruct changes in the paleoproductivity and evolution of the environment, one of which is the grain size effect. We analyzed the BSi distribution in different size fractions from 8 surface sediments collected in the East China Sea (ECS). We observed the particulate characteristics of diatoms in the water and assessed the grain size effect of BSi. The results suggest the following conclusions: (1) the BSi content of the surface sediments in the ECS is generally below 1%, and the BSi content of different size fractions varies significantly, with largest fraction < 16 mu m, which is approximately 1.1-1.8 times that in the bulk sediments. (2) The variation in the BSi content in different size fractions is largely controlled by the species of diatoms and their cell sizes. In the East China Sea, nano-diatoms are the dominant species, with dominant cells of 2-14 mu m, resulting in a high BSi content in the fraction <16 mu m. (3) The hydrodynamic condition affects the diatom cell size distribution and sediment character, and, thus, has a significant influence on the BSi content of different size fractions. Our research suggests that the grain size distribution of the bulk sediment should be considered when using BSi as a proxy for diatom primary production. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available