4.5 Article

Patch testing with methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone 200 ppm aq. detects significantly more contact allergy than 100 ppm. A multicentre study within the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group

Journal

CONTACT DERMATITIS
Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 31-34

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cod.12241

Keywords

adverse reactions; allergic contact dermatitis; contact allergy; delayed hypersensitivity; dose/cm(2) skin area; European baseline series; MCI/MI; micropipette; patch test sensitization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI) and methylisothiazolinone (MI) are the active ingredients in commonly used preservative systems (e.g. KathonCG((R))). MCI/MI is present in the European baseline patch test series at 100 ppm aq. Since 1986, 200 ppm (dose 0.006 mg/cm(2)) has been used in Sweden without causing skin irritation. Centres in Spain, the United Kingdom and Ireland have also used 200 ppm in their baseline series. Objectives. To find the optimal patch test concentration for MCI/MI. Materials and methods. MCI/MI 100 ppm aq. and MCI/MI 200 ppm aq. were simultaneously patch tested in 3300 consecutively tested dermatitis patients at eight European patch test clinics and one US patch test clinic. With the Finn Chambers (R) technique (diameter 8 mm), 15 mu l was micropipetted on to the filter paper in the chamber. The corresponding volume for Van der Bend (R) chambers was 20 mu l, and that for IQ Chambers (R) was 25 mu l. Results. Contact allergy to MCI/MI at 100 and 200 ppm was found in 1.2% and 2.1% of patients, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusions. MCI/MI 200 ppm aq. (dose 0.006 mg/cm(2)) diagnoses significantly more contact allergy than the presently used concentration of 100 ppm (dose 0.003 mg/cm(2)), without resulting in more adverse reactions. MCI/MI at 200 ppm should therefore be considered for inclusion in the European baseline test series.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available