4.3 Article

Effect of zinc ions on improving implant fixation in osteoporotic bone

Journal

CONNECTIVE TISSUE RESEARCH
Volume 54, Issue 4-5, Pages 290-296

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/03008207.2013.813495

Keywords

Hydroxyapatite; implant; osseointegration; osteoporosis; surface modification; zinc

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81070869]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB933902]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The application of titanium (Ti) and its alloys in tooth restoration and joint replacement for aged patients with unfavorable conditions is gaining popularity. Therefore, strategies aiming at improving the fixation of Ti-based implants are worth investigating. This study was designed to observe whether modification of Ti implants by zinc (Zn) could enhance the fixation capability in osteoporotic bone. Two kinds of implants, hydroxyapatite (HA) coated Ti and Zn-incorporated HA (ZnHA) coated Ti, were inserted into the femoral metaphysis longitudinally in ovariectomized (OVX) rats. Specimens were harvested and subjected to double fluorescence labeling examination at week 6 after surgery. At week 12, samples were evaluated with histomorphometry, micro-CT (mu CT) analysis and biomechanical test. Compared to the HA coated implants, ZnHA coating improved mineral apposition rate (MAR) of peri-implant bone, which was revealed by double fluorescence labeling; bone area ratio (BA) and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) were also higher for the latter group by histomorphometry. mu CT images suggested that more bone mass was formed around the ZnHA coated implants as compared to the HA coated implants. Biomechanical push-out test showed that the ZnHA coated implants demonstrated higher strength of osseointegration than the HA group. The current study suggested that Zn ions could enhance bone formation and improve implant fixation in OVX rats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available