4.2 Article

Influence of the structure and morphology of CuO supports on the amount and properties of copper-cerium interfacial sites in inverse CeO2/CuO catalysts

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
Volume 404, Issue -, Pages 193-203

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2015.05.001

Keywords

Support morphology; Cerium-copper catalysts; Interfacial sites; Deactivation; Regeneration

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21466024]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia [2014MS0217]
  3. Program for Science and Technology Leading Talent and Innovation Team of Inner Mongolia
  4. Program for the Development of Innovative Teams in Universities of Inner Mongolia [NMGIRT1105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CuO supports with different morphologies were prepared and the inverse CeO2/CuO catalysts were synthesized by the impregnation method. The catalysts were characterized via SEM, XRD, H-2-TPR, in situ DRIFTS, XPS, TEM and N-2 adsorption-desorption techniques. It is found that the CeO2/CuO-X catalysts present good catalytic performance in the CO-PROX reaction. Catalytic performance is related to BET specific surface area, Ce3+ content and reduction temperature of CuO. Cu+ species is CO adsorption site over the CeO2/CuO catalysts. The carbonate and hydrogen carbonate species cover the surface of CeO2/CuO catalysts at high temperature, and these species could cause the deactivation of the catalysts. The CuO particles are reduced into the metallic copper with large crystallite sizes after the reaction. The metallic copper is oxidized into CuO again, while the crystallite sizes of CeO2 and CuO both increase via regeneration. There are two possible ways to solve the problem of deactivation. One is to control the reaction temperature, and the other is to prevent the generation of metallic copper by promoting structure and morphology of the CuO support. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available