4.7 Article

Computer-aided diagnosis with textural features for breast lesions in sonograms

Journal

COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 220-226

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2010.11.003

Keywords

Ultrasound; Computer-aided diagnosis; Texture analysis; Breast cancer; Principal component analysis; Image retrieval

Funding

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China (Taiwan) [NSC 98-2221-E-029-026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale and objectives: Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems provided second beneficial support reference and enhance the diagnostic accuracy. This paper was aimed to develop and evaluate a CAD with texture analysis in the classification of breast tumors for ultrasound images. Materials and methods: The ultrasound (US) dataset evaluated in this study composed of 1020 sonograms of region of interest (ROI) subimages from 255 patients. Two-view sonogram (longitudinal and transverse views) and four different rectangular regions were utilized to analyze each tumor. Six practical textural features from the US images were performed to classify breast tumors as benign or malignant. However, the textural features always perform as a high dimensional vector: high dimensional vector is unfavorable to differentiate breast tumors in practice. The principal component analysis (PCA) was used to reduce the dimension of textural feature vector and then the image retrieval technique was performed to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. In the experiments, all the cases were sampled with k-fold cross-validation (k = 10) to evaluate the performance with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The area (A(Z)) under the ROC curve for the proposed CAD system with the specific textural features was 0.925 +/- 0.019. The classification ability for breast tumor with textural information is satisfactory. Conclusions: This system differentiates benign from malignant breast tumors with a good result and is therefore clinically useful to provide a second opinion. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available