4.7 Article

In silico FRET from simulated dye dynamics

Journal

COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 184, Issue 3, Pages 841-852

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.10.018

Keywords

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer; Molecular conformation; Monte Carlo; Molecular dynamics; Markov Chain; Single molecule

Funding

  1. German Israeli Foundation [1000.89.9/2008]
  2. Nanoscale Photonic Imaging [SFB 755]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) experiments probe molecular distances on the nanometer scale. In such experiments, distances are recorded from FRET transfer efficiencies via the Forster formula, E = 1/(1 + (R/R-0)(6)). The energy transfer however also depends on the mutual orientation of the two dyes used as distance reporter. Since this information is typically inaccessible in FRET experiments, one has to rely on approximations, which reduce the accuracy of these distance measurements. A common approximation is an isotropic and uncorrelated dye orientation distribution. To assess the impact of such approximations, we present the algorithms and implementation of a computational toolkit for the simulation of smFRET on the basis of molecular dynamics (MD) trajectory ensembles. In this study, the dye orientation dynamics, which are used to determine dynamic FRET efficiencies, are extracted from MD simulations. In a subsequent step, photons and bursts are generated using a Monte Carlo algorithm. The application of the developed toolkit on a poly-proline system demonstrated good agreement between smFRET simulations and experimental results and therefore confirms our computational method. Furthermore, it enabled the identification of the structural basis of measured heterogeneity. The presented computational toolkit is written in Python, available as open-source, applicable to arbitrary systems and can easily be extended and adapted to further problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available