4.7 Article

Assessment of ventricular contractility and ventricular-arterial coupling with a model-based sensor

Journal

COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages 182-189

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.11.009

Keywords

Cardiovascular; Model; Intensive care; Sensor; Ventricular function; ICU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estimation of ventricular contractility and ventricular arterial coupling is clinically important in diagnosing and treating cardiac dysfunction in the critically ill. However, experimental assessment of indexes of ventricular contractility, such as the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship, requires a highly invasive maneuver and measurements that are not typical in an intensive care unit (ICU). This research describes the use of a previously validated cardiovascular system model and parameter identification process to evaluate the right ventricular arterial coupling in septic shock. Model-based ventricular arterial coupling is defined by the ratio of the end systolic right ventricular elastance (E-esrvf) over the pulmonary artery elastance (E-pa) or the mean pulmonary inflow resistance (R-pulin). Results are compared to the clinical gold-standard assessment (conductance catheter method). Six anesthetized healthy pigs weighing 20-30 kg received a 0.5 mg kg(-1) endotoxin infusion over a period of 30 min from T0 to T30, to induce septic shock and veno-venous hemofiltration was used from T60 onward. The results show good agreement with the gold-standard experimental assessment. In particular, the model-based right ventricular elastance (E-esrvf) correlates well with the clinical gold standard (R-2=0.69) and the model-based non-invasive coupling (E-esrvf/R-pulin) follow the same trends and dynamics (R-2=0.37). The overall results show the potential to develop a model-based sensor to monitor ventricular-arterial coupling in clinical real-time. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available