4.5 Article

An experimental and theoretical study on the prediction of forming limit diagrams using new BBC yield criteria and M-K analysis

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 1272-1280

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.08.013

Keywords

Formability; Forming limit diagrams; FLD; Yield function; Hardening law; M-K analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present paper, a comprehensive study on the prediction of forming limit diagrams (FLDs) for an AA3003-O aluminium alloy is developed theoretically and experimentally. For obtaining the experimental FLDs, an out-of-plane formability test was performed based on the technique proposed by Ozturk and Lee IF. Ozturk, D. LeeJ Mater. Process. Technol. 170 (2005) 247-253]. The classical Marciniak-Kuczynski (M-K) model and some new yield criteria are utilized to simulate the necking phenomenon and calculate the limit strains theoretically. The employed yield functions are: the BBC2000, BBC2002, and BBC2003 yield criteria proposed by Banabic et al. [D. Banabic, S.D. Comsa, T. Balan, in: Proceedings of the Cold Metal Forming 2000 Conference, Cluj-Napoca, 2000, p. 217: D. Banabic. T. Kuwabara, T. Balan, D.S. Comsa, D. Julean, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 45 (2003) 797-811; D. Banabic, H. Aretz, D.S. Comsa, L Paraianu, Int. J. Plast. 21 (2005) 493-512]. To calibrate and determine each particular coefficients of performed yield functions an appropriate error-function is defined and minimized by a Newton algorithm. To compare the calculated yield stresses and r-values with experimental data a relative root mean square deviation method presented by Leacock [Alan G. Leacock, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 54 (2006) 425-444] is used. Work-hardening effects on the FLD are analyzed by using Swift and Voce hardening laws. The effect of yield surface on the prediction of numerical FLDs and the number of experimental anisotropy parameters on the accuracy ofyield functions are also studied. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available