4.7 Article

Flexural and compression response of woven E-glass/polyester-CNF nanophased composites

Journal

COMPOSITES PART A-APPLIED SCIENCE AND MANUFACTURING
Volume 42, Issue 11, Pages 1774-1782

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.033

Keywords

Glass fibers; Mechanical properties; Electron microscopy

Funding

  1. funding agency DOE
  2. NSF-EPSCoR
  3. NSF-RISE
  4. NSF-CREST

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A significant improvement in fiber reinforced polymeric composite (FRPC) materials can be obtained by incorporating a very small amount of nanofiller in the matrix material. In this work, an ultrasonic liquid processor was used to infuse carbon nanofiber (CNF) into the polyester matrix which was then mixed with catalyst using a mechanical agitator. Both conventional and CNF-filled glass-fiber reinforced polyester composites (GRPC) were fabricated using the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) process. Excellent dispersion of CNFs into the polyester resin was observed from the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs. Flexural and quasi-static tests were performed for investigating the mechanical responses. Fracture surface was examined using optical microscopy (OM) and SEM. Flexure tests performed on the conventional GRPC, 0.1-0.4 wt.% CNF-filled GRPC showed up to 49% and 31% increase in the flexural strength and modulus, respectively, compared to the conventional one with increasing loading of CNFs up to 0.2 wt.%. Similar trend was seen in quasi-static compression properties. SEM evaluation revealed relatively less damage in the tested fracture surfaces of the nanophased composites in terms of matrix failure, fiber breakage, matrix-fiber debonding, and delamination, compared to the conventional one. This might be the result of better interfacial interaction between matrix and fibers, due to the presence of CNFs. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available