4.7 Article

Quasi-static axial crushing and transverse bending of double hat shaped CFRP tubes

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.06.024

Keywords

CFRP tube; Crashworthiness; Axial crushing; Transverse bending

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51205422]
  2. China Scholarship Council Foundation [201306385025]
  3. Daiko Foundation
  4. Pearl River Nova Program of Guangzhou [2014J2200005]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [12Igpy46]
  6. Dongguan Municipal Science and Technology Program [2012108102020]
  7. Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body [31315009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper aims to explore the failure modes and crashworthiness characteristics of double hat shaped tubes made of weave carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) subjected to quasi-static axial crushing and transverse bending. Experimental investigations were carried out into three different thicknesses of the composite tubes fabricated by the bladder molding process. Three distinct failure modes, classified as progressive end crushing (I), unstable local buckling (II) and mid-length collapse (III), were observed in the axial crushing tests, whereas only one similar progressive collapse mode was observed in transverse bending tests. It is shown that the thickness is a critical parameter affecting the failure mode and energy absorption capability, leading to the increase in the peak load and specific energy absorption (SEA) during the tests. The SEA of the tested double hat shaped tubes under axial crushing ranges from 60 to 90 J/g, which is marginally higher than that of regular sectional CFRP tubes but over 2 times of that of conventional metallic tubes. By comparison, the load bearing and energy absorption capabilities of the tubes under transverse bending are much lower than those of the axially compressed tubes (less than 10% and 1%, respectively). (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available