4.7 Article

Experimental determination of the structural properties and strengthening mechanisms of z-pinned composite T-joints

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 93, Issue 9, Pages 2222-2230

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.009

Keywords

Polymer matrix composites; T-joints; Z-pins; Through-thickness reinforcement

Funding

  1. RMIT University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an experimental investigation into the efficacy of z-pins to improve the structural properties of stiffened joints made of carbon/epoxy composite. Pull-off tests were performed on T-joints without z-pins or reinforced along the skin-stiffener bond-line with z-pins to volume contents of 0.5%, 2% or 4%. Testing was performed at different pull-off load angles between 0 degrees and 45 degrees to the stiffener to induce different proportions of normal (through-thickness) tensile and in-plane secondary bending stresses along the skin-stiffener bond-line. It was found that z-pins do not improve the stiffness or failure initiation load of T-joints, but they are effective at raising the ultimate failure strength, failure displacement, and absorbed energy capacity. These properties increase rapidly with the z-pin content, and maximum improvements of about 75% to the ultimate strength and over 600% to the total absorbed energy capacity were achieved at the highest pin content (4% by volume). The percent improvements to the structural properties are approximately the same for the different load angles, revealing that z-pins are equally effective at resisting bond-line cracking under normal tensile or secondary bending stresses. Fractographic analysis revealed that z-pins increase the joint properties by creating bridging tractions across the bond-line crack between the stiffener and skin. The z-pins ultimately fail by a combination of debonding/pull-out from the adherends. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available