4.3 Article

Dose escalation studies with caspofungin against Candida glabrata

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 998-1007

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.000116

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. TAMOP [4.2.4. A/2-11-1-2012-0001]
  2. European Union
  3. European Social Fund
  4. NIH [AI109025]
  5. Astellas
  6. Scynexis
  7. Cidara
  8. MSD
  9. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Echinocandins are recommended as first-line agents against invasive fungal infections caused by Candida glabrata, which still carry a high mortality rate. Dose escalation of echinocandins has been suggested to improve the clinical outcome against C. glabrata. To address this possibility, we performed in vitro and in vivo experiments with caspofungin against four WT C. glabrata clinical isolates, a drug-susceptible ATCC 90030 reference strain and two echinocandin-resistant strains with known FKS mutations. MIC values for the clinical isolates in RPM! 1 640 were <= 0.03 mg l(-1) but increased to 0.125-0.25 mg l(-1) in RPMI 1640 +50% serum. In RPM! 1640 +50 % serum, the replication of C. glabrata was weaker than in RPM! 1640.Caspofungin in RPM! 1640 at 1 and 4 mg l(-1) showed a fungicidal effect within 7 h against three of the four clinical isolates but was only fungistatic at 16 and 32 mg l(-1) (paradoxically decreased killing activity). In RPMI 1640 +50 % serum, caspofungin at >= 1 mg l(-1) was rapidly fungicidal (within 3.31 h) against three of the four isolates. In a profoundly neutropenic murine model, all caspofungin doses (1, 2, 3, 5 and 20 mg kg(-1) daily) decreased the fungal tissue burdens significantly (P<0.05-0.001) without statistical differences between doses, but the mean fungal tissue burdens never fell below 10(5) cells (g tissue)(-1). The echinocandin-resistant strains were highly virulent in animal models and all doses were ineffective. These results confirm the clinical experience that caspofungin dose escalation does not improve efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available