4.2 Article

Explosive characteristics of aluminized HMX-based nanocomposites

Journal

COMBUSTION EXPLOSION AND SHOCK WAVES
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 198-212

Publisher

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10573-008-0027-8

Keywords

HMX; nanoaluminum; composite; detonation velocity; pressure; temperature; propellant performance; heat of explosion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The explosive characteristics of HMX compositions doped with 15% Al (by weight) were studied experimentally. The detonation velocity, pressure and temperature profiles, the velocity of endwise acceleration of plates, and the heat of explosion of dense pressed samples were measured. The results were compared for compositions based on mechanical mixtures of initial micron-size particles of HMX with aluminum powders of various sizes and for nanocomposites. The addition of nanoaluminum reduces the detonation velocity to a greater degree than the addition of micron-size aluminum. The mechanical mixtures have close detonation velocities, whereas in composites containing different types of nanoaluminum, they differ by almost 200 m/sec. For all compositions, except for the most homogeneous nanocomposite, two-peak pressure profiles are observed. For charges of a composite and a mechanical mixture with nanoaluminum of the same type, the second peak pressures almost coincide but are reached in different times. At the same time, the peak pressure increases with decreasing aluminum particle size. The temperature profiles agree qualitatively with the pressure profiles. The velocity of endwise acceleration of plates depends linearly on the activity of the aluminum powder used. Nanocomposites and mechanical mixtures containing the same aluminum powder have close heats of explosion. Nanoaluminum is almost completely oxidized during calorimeter bomb tests, and the major factor determining the heat of explosion of the compositions with nanoaluminum is also the content of active metal in the aluminum powder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available