4.5 Article

Validation study of the Japanese version of the faecal incontinence quality of life scale

Journal

COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 194-199

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02558.x

Keywords

Faecal incontinence; quality of life; faecal incontinence quality of life; scale; validity; reliability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim The aim of the present study was to conduct a psychometric validation of the Japanese version of the FIQL (JFIQL). Method A retrospective analysis of data from the JFIQL was conducted. Wexner scores and Faecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) scores were collected prospectively in patients with faecal incontinence who visited our centre between 2008 and 2009. For convergent validity, the JFIQL scores were compared with stages on the Wexner scale for lifestyle alteration. To evaluate reliability, Cronbach's alpha was calculated for internal consistency, whereas a test-retest study was performed to evaluate reproducibility. In assessing responsiveness, JFIQL scores before and after treatments were compared in patients whose FISI scores decreased by 50%. Results Convergent validity and internal consistency were determined in 70 patients (49 women; median age 68.5 years). The JFIQL scores were significantly associated with lifestyle alteration stages on the Wexner scale, demonstrating convergent validity in all four domains and the generic score. Cronbach's alpha was > 0.7 for generic scores and all domains except Embarrassment. The intraclass correlations for the 27 patients available for the test-retest study were > 0.7 for generic scores and all domains except Embarrassment. The median JFIQL score improved significantly after treatment in the 23 patients whose FISI scores decreased 50%, indicating good responsiveness in all four domains and the generic score. Conclusion The JFIQL has been validated and is now ready for use in evaluating the symptom-specific quality of life in Japanese patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available