4.7 Article

A quantitative assessment of inhaled drug particle-pulmonary surfactant interaction by atomic force microscopy

Journal

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages 97-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.05.003

Keywords

Atomic force microscopy; Langmuir-Blodgett; Survanta (R); Inhaled drug particles; Pulmonary surfactant

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. The University of Nottingham f

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To date limited consideration has been given to the physical interaction between inhaled drug particles and pulmonary surfactant (PS). This study combines atomic force microscopy (AFM) with a Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) approach to quantify the force of adhesion between micronised budesonide particles and simulated PS monolayers. A LB approach was used to prepare Survanta (R) monolayers at pre-determined surface pressures and AFM was employed to facilitate their visualisation. Adhesion measurements between drug particles and PS monolayers were executed via AFM. Contact angle measurements were performed to probe material wetting characteristics, the data confirmed that budesonide is hydrophobic and Survanta (R) films at increasing surface pressure exhibit a rising hydrophobic character. AFM revealed that PS properties were governed by applied surface pressure and that the degree of interaction of budesonide was greater at higher surface pressure, where packing of the lipid film was increased: consistent with the point of exhalation. This correlates well with the accepted inhaler technique. The increasing hydrophobicity of the PS film, on increased pressure, was believed to be the primary reason for increased interaction with the hydrophobic budesonide. Surface chemistries of the drug particles and PS interface are considered to be important for inhaled drug delivery. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available