4.2 Article

Novel global and local 3D atom-based linear descriptors of the Minkowski distance matrix: theory, diversity-variability analysis and QSPR applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 53, Issue 9, Pages 2028-2064

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10910-015-0533-3

Keywords

TOMOCOMD-CARDD; 3D-linear index; Variability analysis; QSPR study

Funding

  1. Consejo de Desarrollo Cientifico y Humanistico (CONDES-LUZ) [CC-0593-10]
  2. Fondo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion (FONACIT) [G-2005000403]
  3. Mision Ciencia [2007000881]
  4. Instituto Zuliano de Investigaciones Tecnologicas (INZIT, Project LOCTI)
  5. program 'Estades Temporals per an Investigadors Convidats'
  6. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) [SAF2009-10399]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new family of alignment-free 3D descriptors based on TOMOCOMD-CARDD framework has been designed, namely 3D-linear indices. In this report, we have proposed the use of a generalized form of the geometric pairwise atom-atom distance matrix as structural information matrix. This matrix, denominated as non-stochastic, uses as matrix form of linear maps as well as their algebraic transformations: stochastic, double stochastic and mutual probabilities matrices. The methodology for 3D-QSAR studies is based on the combined use of global and local approaches. Principal component analysis reveals that the novel indices are capable of capturing structural information not codified by the indices implemented in the DRAGON's software. Moreover, Shannon's entropy based variability analysis comparing the 3D-linear indices with some relevant descriptors suggests that the former encode similar-to-better amount of structural information than these descriptors. Finally, a search for the best regressions for congeneric databases in QSPR modeling was performed. The overall results demonstrates satisfactory behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available