4.4 Article

Structure coefficients and strategy selection in multiplayer games

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 72, Issue 1-2, Pages 203-238

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00285-015-0882-3

Keywords

Evolutionary dynamics; Finite populations; Game theory; Stochastic processes; Weak selection

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Foundational Questions in Evolutionary Biology Fund (FQEB) [RFP-12-10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evolutionary processes based on two-player games such as the Prisoner's Dilemma or Snowdrift Game are abundant in evolutionary game theory. These processes, including those based on games with more than two strategies, have been studied extensively under the assumption that selection is weak. However, games involving more than two players have not received the same level of attention. To address this issue, and to relate two-player games to multiplayer games, we introduce a notion of reducibility for multiplayer games that captures what it means to break down a multiplayer game into a sequence of interactions with fewer players. We discuss the role of reducibility in structured populations, and we give examples of games that are irreducible in any population structure. Since the known conditions for strategy selection, otherwise known as -rules, have been established only for two-player games with multiple strategies and for multiplayer games with two strategies, we extend these rules to multiplayer games with many strategies to account for irreducible games that cannot be reduced to those simpler types of games. In particular, we show that the number of structure coefficients required for a symmetric game with -player interactions and strategies grows in like . Our results also cover a type of ecologically asymmetric game based on payoff values that are derived not only from the strategies of the players, but also from their spatial positions within the population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available