4.4 Article

Preparation of macroporous polyHIPE foams via radiation-induced polymerization at room temperature

Journal

COLLOID AND POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 291, Issue 7, Pages 1649-1656

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-013-2899-8

Keywords

High internal-phase emulsion; Macroporous materials; Gamma-irradiation; Methyl methacrylate; Styrene; polyHIPEs

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50873096, 21074122]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2007CB936401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PolyHIPEs are highly porous, crosslinked polymer foams typically synthesized within high internal-phase emulsions (HIPEs). Two kinds of polyHIPEs including poly(styrene-divinylbenzene) [P(St-DVB)] and poly(methyl methacrylate-divinylbenzene) [P(MMA-DVB)] foams are synthesized in this work, which are fabricated from HIPEs template via radiation-induced polymerization at room temperature. Traditional free radical polymerization initiated by potassium peroxydisulfate (KPS) at 60 A degrees C for producing polyHIPE P(St-DVB) foams is also conducted for comparison. It is found that the amount of emulsifier can be reduced greatly in the radiation-induced polymerization of HIPEs at room temperature, compared with the traditional polymerization approach. Besides, P(MMA-DVB) PolyHIPE foams with a fine microstructure of highly interconnected pores have been successfully fabricated via radiation-induced polymerization in this work, which is usually difficult to be prepared by thermal-initiation method because of the intermediate hydrophobicity of methyl methacrylate monomer. The influences of the fraction of internal aqueous phase and the concentration of emulsifier on the structure and performance of foams are carefully explored. The structure and compression strength of the foams are characterized by scanning electron microscopy and a mechanical testing machine, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available