4.7 Article

Drilling fluid technology in ice sheets: Hydrostatic pressure and borehole closure considerations

Journal

COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue -, Pages 47-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.10.012

Keywords

Ice drilling technology; Drilling fluid density; Borehole closure; Ice flow parameters

Funding

  1. general project Research on environmental friendly drilling fluid impact on Polar regions environment [41276189]
  2. Ministry of Land and Resources of China [201311041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The drilling of deep boreholes in ice sheets requires that the hole is filled by a liquid to compensate the ice-overburden pressure. Density is the most important drilling fluid property, so the hydrostatic pressure of the fluid column should be sufficient to prevent closure of the borehole. However, it is impossible to prevent borehole closure at all, because the upper part of glaciers contains a lot of air inclusions and the density of snow-firn zone is much less than the rest stratum, and the expansion coefficient and the compressibility of fluids and ice are rather different. That is why at all accounts there are parts in the borehole, where the ice pressure is higher than the pressure of fluid. One of the main ideas of ice deep drilling technology is the limitation of the closure rate by controlling the density of the drilling fluid. First, it is proposed to choose the depth of the pressure equilibrium and the average fluid density at average temperature in the borehole. Then, the hydrostatic pressure and pressure difference at the borehole walls can be estimated. Finally, the diameter changes in the interval with negative pressure difference are predicted and compared with maximal safety values. This method allows to choose the correct fluid density and the fluid level below surface for the concrete drilling site and to ensure accident-free drilling in ice sheets. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available