4.0 Article

Cognitive but Not Affective Theory of Mind Deficits in Mild Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Journal

COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 25-30

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000017

Keywords

frontal lobe; executive function; theory of mind; multiple sclerosis; cognition

Funding

  1. Merck Serono
  2. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico [1130920]
  3. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas
  4. Fundacion Instituto de Neurologia Cognitiva

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We studied theory of mind (ToM) in patients with mild relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), seeking possible dissociations between its 2 components: cognitive ToM (the ability to infer others' intentions) and affective ToM (the ability to infer others' emotional states). We analyzed the relationship of ToM to executive function, depression, and fatigue. Background: Dissociations between cognitive and affective ToM have been found in several neurologic and neuropsychiatric diseases. Most ToM studies in patients with MS have shown general ToM deficits but have not analyzed the cognitive and affective aspects individually. Methods: We used the Faux Pas test of ToM and tests of executive function to assess 18 patients with mild relapsing-remitting MS and 16 control participants. Results: Our patients showed deficits in cognitive ToM, but their affective ToM seemed to be spared. Their cognitive ToM deficits were not related to executive dysfunction, depression, or fatigue. Conclusions: Our study is the first differential analysis showing cognitive but not affective ToM deficits in mild relapsing-remitting MS. Further research is needed to determine the exact nature and the real impact of these deficits, and to establish their relationship with the neuropathology and progression of MS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available