4.4 Article

DEEP BREATHING HEART RATE VARIABILITY IS ASSOCIATED WITH RESPIRATORY MUSCLE WEAKNESS IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE

Journal

CLINICS
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 369-375

Publisher

HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
DOI: 10.1590/S1807-59322010000400004

Keywords

COPD; Heart-rate variability; Respiratory sinusal arrhythmia; Respiratory muscle strength

Funding

  1. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: A synchronism exists between the respiratory and cardiac cycles. However, the influence of the inspiratory muscle weakness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on cardiac autonomic control is unknown. The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate the influence of respiratory muscle strength on autonomic control in these patients. METHODS: Ten chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients (69 +/- 9 years; FEV1/FVC 59 +/- 12% and FEV(1)41 +/- 11% predicted) and nine age-matched healthy volunteers (64 +/- 5 years) participated in this study. Heart-rate variability (HRV) was obtained at rest and during respiratory sinusal arrhythmia maneuver (RSA-M) by electrocardiograph. RESULTS: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients demonstrated impaired cardiac autonomic modulation at rest and during RSA-M when compared with healthy subjects (p<0.05). Moreover, significant and positive correlations between maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and the inspiratory-expiratory difference (Delta IE) (r = 0.60, p<0.01) were found. CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease presented impaired sympathetic-vagal balance at rest. In addition, cardiac autonomic control of heart rate was associated with inspiratory muscle weakness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Based on this evidence, future research applications of respiratory muscle training may bring to light a potentially valuable target for rehabilitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available