4.7 Article

Haem oxygenase-I gene transfer protects retinal ganglion cells from ischaemia/reperfusion injury

Journal

CLINICAL SCIENCE
Volume 115, Issue 11-12, Pages 335-342

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/CS20070384

Keywords

adenovirus; gene therapy; haem oxygenase; ischaemia/reperfusion; ocular disease; retinal ganglion cell

Funding

  1. Shin-Kong Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan [SKH-TMU-94-13, SKH-TMU-96-08]
  2. Center of Excellence for Clinical Trials and Research in Neurology
  3. Topnotch Stroke Research Centelgrant
  4. Ministry of Education, Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RGC (retinal ganglion cell) death following ischaemic insult is the major cause of a number of vision-threatening diseases, including glaucoma. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of HO-I (haem oxygenase-I) in the retina against IR (ischaemia/reperfusion) injury. Adenovirus-mediated HO-I gene transfer (Adv-HO-I) was carried out by injection into the vitreous body to induce HO-I overexpression. At 3 weeks after transfection, levels of HO-I expression, as measured by Western blot analysis, immunohistochemical staining and activity assay, were drastically upregulated. Transient retinal ischaemia was induced by raising the intraocular pressure to 150 mmHg for 60 min. Untreated IR caused a significant decrease in RGC numbers at 3 and 7 days after reperfusion (76.1 and 67.2% of control eyes with sham IR respectively; P < 0.001). Eyes pretreated with Adv-HO-I had less RGC loss on day 3 and 7 following reperfusion compared with control eyes injected with Adv-GFP (adenovirus containing a gene for green fluorescent protein; 94.3 and 88.2% respectively; P = 0.007 and 0.001). SnP (tin protoporphyrin), an HO-I inhibitor, counteracted the effects of Adv-HO-I. In conclusion, these findings provide evidence that augmentation of HO-I enzyme overexpression by intravitreal injection is able to protect RGCs against IR-induced damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available