4.4 Article

Association of abnormal lipid spectrum with the disease activity of Takayasu arteritis

Journal

CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 7, Pages 1243-1248

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-014-2819-4

Keywords

ApoB/ApoA1 ratio; Atherosclerosis; Disease activity; Takayasu arteritis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81170285]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20101106110012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our study aimed to determine whether proatherogenic lipid profiles exist in patients with active Takayasu arteritis (TA) and assess the relationship between different lipid profiles and disease activity in TA. A total of 132 premenopausal female patients with TA and 100 sex-, age-, and body mass index-matched healthy controls were included in our study. The clinical data were collected in detail from all participants. Patients with active TA had significantly lower levels of apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1) (1.47 +/- 0.30 vs. 1.99 +/- 0.33 mmol/L, p < 0.001) and lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (1.23 +/- 0.33 vs. 1.68 +/- 0.38 mmol/L, p < 0.001) than patients with inactive TA. However, they had higher ratios of apolipoprotein B (apoB)/apoA1 (0.74 +/- 0.27 vs. 0.48 +/- 0.14, p < 0.001) compared with patients with inactive TA. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that the apoB/apoA1 ratio was independently associated with TA activity (beta = 0.38, p = 0.04). In addition, multivariate stepwise forward regression analysis showed that the apoB/apoA1 ratio was the major determinant for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (beta = 0.58, p = 0.002). Our findings indicate that patients with active TA had proatherogenic lipid profiles. In addition, the ratio of apoB to apoA1 could be used as a marker for monitoring and targeting patients with TA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available